REZUMAT
Context: Dezvoltarea neonatologiei a facut posibilă supravieţuirea prematurilor extrem de mici. Sechelele nou-născuţilor pot fi însă serioase şi din acest motiv naşterile premature sunt recunoscute a fi una din principalele probleme de sănătate publică. Este de remarcat faptul că, atât persoane neiniţiate cât şi unii profesionişti nu sunt familiarizati cu faptul că există posibilităţi de prevenţie a naşterii premature atât înainte de sarcină cât şi în timpul sarcinii. Există multe cauze de naştere prematură şi nu toate sunt cunoscute. Din acest motiv este improbabil ca o singură metodă de prevenţie sau un singur medicament să oprească efectiv naşterea prematură. Cele mai multe naşteri premature apar la grupul de gravide fără factori de risc. Metode: Modelele de predicţie a riscului de naştere prematură utilizate în Slovenia recomandă efectuarea unor teste suplimentare. Testele de screening ar trebui utilizate pentru toate gravidele. Aceste teste îmbunătăţesc puterea de predicţie la grupul de paciente fără factori de risc în anamneză. Unii factori de risc identificaţi pot fi influenţaţi. Alţi factori de risc ca de exemplu antecedentele de naştere (naşterea prematură, conizaţia, etc.) nu pot fi influenţaţi. Alţi factori de risc pot fi îndepărtaţi înainte de sarcină prin metode chirurgicale aşa cum este cazul anomaliilor uterine. În sarcină, prezenţa cumulată a unui col uterin scurtat şi a antecedentelor obstetricale sunt un predictor pentru naşterea prematură. Exemple de măsuri de prevenţie secundară sunt tratamentul cu progesteron la pacientele cu risc, tratamentul infecţiilor vaginale în sarcina precoce, cerclajul colului uterin când canalul cervical este scurtat, suportul psihologic şi social. Chiar dacă naşterea prematură nu se mai poate evita, putem prelungi sarcina cu o tocoliză eficientă astfel încât să avem timp să administrăm corticosteroizi şi să transferăm gravida într-un centru terţiar cu secţie de terapie intensivă neonatală, centru ce poate imbunătăţi evoluţia nou-născutului. Prelungirea sarcinii este permisă doar dacă nu este nocivă pentru mamă şi nou-născut. Concluzii: Este necesar să utilizăm cunostiinţele referitoare la prevenţia nasterii premature. În viitor, genomica, proteomica şi farmacogenomica vor face probabil posibilă o predicţie şi o prevenţie mai specifică a naşterii premature.

ABSTRACT
Background: The development of neonatology has led to survival of extremely preterm neonates. Sequels for the neonate might be serious, and for that reason very preterm delivery has been recognised as one of the main problems of public health. But, too many lay persons and even professionals are not aware of the fact that there are, before pregnancy as well as in pregnancy, possibilities of prevention of extremely preterm delivery. There are many causes for preterm delivery and not all are known. It is not probable that one method or one drug would effectively stop preterm labor or prevent delivery. Most of preterm deliveries occur in the group of pregnant women without risk factors. Methods: Prediction model for preterm delivery risk estimation is used in Slovenia with suggestion that additional tests are performed. Screening tests should be used for all pregnant women. These tests would improve the prediction in the group of pregnant population with no risk factors in their medical history. Besides, such risk factors could be found that could be influenced. Some risk factors can not be changed: previous preterm delivery and conisation, e.g. Some risk factors can be removed before pregnancy, like operative correction of uterine anomalies. In pregnancy, combination of short cervix and obstetric history is a good predictor of preterm delivery. Examples of secondary prevention are treatment with progesterone in high risk women, treatment of vaginal infection early in pregnancy, cerclage when cervix is short, psychological and social support. Even when preterm delivery is unavoidable, we can prolong pregnancy with efficient tocolysis so corticosteroids can be applied and the pregnant woman is transported to the centre with neonatal intensive care unit (tertiary prevention), which improves the outcome for the newborn. Prolongation of pregnancy is allowed only when it does not harm the mother or the fetus. Conclusions: We have to use the existing knowledge regarding preterm delivery prevention. In the future, genomics, proteomics and pharmacogenomics will make prediction and prevention of preterm delivery more specific.

INTRODUCTION

The rate of preterm delivery (PTD) is rising.¹ The reasons are several and different for different populations, among them the artificial reproductive techniques (ART), worse maternal health because of increasing age at parturition, poverty, no health insurance etc.^2,3 PTD is in 75 % responsible for neonatal mortality and morbidity; more than two thirds of affected neonates are born before 32 weeks of pregnancy (w.p.), i.e. very preterm. In the prospective observational study the survival up to 25 w.p. was 39 % and the long term morbidity of survivors was very high.^4,5 Those born with birth weight under 1500 g, of whom most are preterm babies, have 60 to 80 times more cerebral palsy.⁶
It can also be expressed financially: in U.S.A. to care for preterm neonate is 28 times more expensive than for a term one (280,146 $ vs. 9,803 $).³ For the first ten years of children born after extremely preterm delivery (before 28 w.p., EPTD), the expenses were 443% compared to expenses for a term neonate.⁷ It is relatively easy to calculate expenses. It is, however, impossible, to quantify consequences for the child and family.
For the whole Slovenia, there are – since 1987 – more than 100 items entered in the National Perinatal Information System (NPIS) database for each mother-neonate pair at delivery.
The percentages of PTD (before 37 w.p.) and very preterm deliveries (before 32 w.p., VPTD) are shown in Table 1; there were on average 0.49% of EPTD in those years.
The percentage of EPTD is twice that reported for seven hospitals in London, where it was 0.23% for years 1998 to 2006 and more than twice that of the rate in Scotland, where it was 0.19% between 1985 and 2005.⁸ (Table 1)
The ratio between spontaneous and iatrogenic EPTD was 3.6:1, and 1:1 for VPTD.
So we have two goals:9
- To find the group of pregnant women who are at high risk for PTD (with help of Prediction model for preterm delivery risk estimation and additional tests);
- To use all known management options to prolong pregnancies over 28 w.p. when prolongation is not dangerous for the mother or the baby.

PRETERM DELIVERY RISK PREDICTION

The process of labour and delivery starts much earlier than the clinical signs are recognisable.³ There are many schemes for prediction of risk for PTD. Verdenik has, on the basis of almost 150 000 deliveries in Slovenia from the NPIS database, elaborated Prediction model for preterm delivery risk estimation.^10,11
The model was validated on another group of women, who also delivered in Slovenia.^{10, 12} Risk factors for VPTD, present before pregnancy, are shown in Table 2 and those in pregnancy are shown in Table 3. Slovenia, with a well established NPIS and with around 18,000 deliveries per year is very appropriate as a perinatal model.
Specific screening tests should be based on pathophysiologic mechanisms.

Table 2. Scoring system for very preterm delivery risk for factors present before pregnancy.

Table 3. Scoring system for very preterm delivery risk for factors present in pregnancy.

MECHANISMS OF PRETERM DELIVERY

Lockwood explains four processes that lead to common pathway of PTD. Extracellular matrix changes, which is visible as ripening of the cervix. Fetus also has a role in the initiation of labour.^13-16
The first process, evident by stress and anxiety, is more often found in young primiparas with genetic predisposition.^17-19 Stress of the fetus also leads to elevated levels of corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH), the mediator of stress. Changes in ACTH, prostaglandins, oxytocin receptors, matrix metallo-proteinases, interleukin-8, cyclooxygenase-2, DHEAS, placental estrogens and fetal adrenal enlargement follow. The latter, in connection with preterm delivery, was found already in 1971, before the era of ultrasound (US).²⁰ Later Turan prospectively measured fetal adrenals in women with preterm labor.²¹ In women that finally delivered preterm, fetal adrenals were enlarged. The incidence of PTD is higher in Homo sapiens than in other mammals; reasons for that being upright walk, narrower pelvis, bigger brain, speech, and social connections.¹ The incidence of PTD is higher in lower social classes, undernourished and pathologically overweight (ITM > 35kg/m2).^3,16,22-24
Specific markers for the first process are CRH and salivary estriol but they did not prove themselves as predictors of preterm delivery.^25-27 The levels of CRH are consistent with psychological tests regarding stress.²⁸ In Slovenia, the EUROPOP research showed that the level of stress is the highest in employed women, who do no housework.²⁹ The explanation was that they are afraid of becoming unemployed if they use their sick leave when feeling sick, so they just rest at home after work.
The second process is deciduo-chorio-amnionitis as the result of systemic infection, which is the cause of more than 50 % of EPTD.³⁰ Periodontal disease might lead to PTD.³¹ Bacterial vaginosis (BV), diagnosed before 16 w.p., is significantly connected with PTD; BV helps development of pathological organisms.^32-42
With proteomic profile the intra-amniotic infection was proved.⁴³ Maternal and fetal inflammatory responses are changed, leading to preterm labour when there is genetic predisposition; because of that, there might be specific treatment in the future.^{44, 45} There is ongoing research to find genes for term as well as for PTD.⁴⁶ Maternal immune reaction is more often seen in male fetuses.⁴⁷ Infection also influences fetal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.⁴⁸ Conisation is a high risk factor for PTD.⁴⁹ As with induced abortions, related to EPTD, infectious or mechanical causes may be involved.⁵⁰
C reactive protein (CRP) and pro-inflammatory cytokines are not sensitive enough as markers; pentraxin 3 (PTX3) might be more useful. CRP is produced in liver in response to IL-6, and PTX3 is produced in different cells in response to IL-1, tumor necrosis factor, and bacterial products.⁵¹ The population, where PTD evolves after this process, is usually young, from a minority and usually poor.
The third process is related to abruption of placenta. Retroplacental haematoma is found in a third of PTD and in less than one percent of term deliveries. The causes are primary or secondary thrombophilias, hypertension, cocain abuse, trauma and others.
Sclerosis of myometrial arteries is found in 11 % of 18 years old women and in 83 % after 39 years of age.⁵² The elevation of blood pressure is higher in women, who deliver before 34 w.p.⁵³ Elevated homocysteine level is a risk factor for arterial diseases and venous thrombosis; in pregnant women, apoptosis of the trophoblast is induced, human chorionic gonadotropin production is decreased and problems with placentation might follow.⁵⁴ Homocysteine induces human myometrial contractions.⁵⁵ Changes of genes, coding the folate metabolism, elevate the risk for preterm delivery.⁵⁶
The marker of the third process is thrombin-antithrombin complex.⁵⁷ In the third group are older, educated multiparas.
The fourth process is over-distension of the uterus because of multiple pregnancies, polihydramnion, or relative over-distension because of uterine anomalies or operations of the cervix.⁴⁹ IL-8, prostaglandins and COX-2 mediate the process.²⁷
The risk for PTD and other obstetrical complications increases in infertile women regardless of medical (non) intervention, and after ART also.^58,59
Markers for all four processes are fetal fibronectin and cervical length.^60-65 Combination of cervical assessment in combination with phIGFBP-1 at 30 weeks had the steepest ROC curve (area under the curve = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.98, P < 0.001).⁶⁶ Inflammation, abruption and over-distension all end in short cervix. Light-induced fluorescence is a method that measures the ripeness of the cervix; together with electrohysterography (EHG) it is a good predictor of successful induction of labor.⁶⁷ The use of EHG as a predictor of PTD is still in research area.^68-70 β-human chorionic gonadotropin, α-fetoprotein, inhibin, activin, relaxin and others were also evaluated as markers.⁷¹ The goal of our study RP P3-0124 is to find pregnant women at high risk for PTD and use all proven managements to prolong pregnancy over 28 w.p. if this does not harm the woman or fetus. The study was approved by State Ethical Committee (No 90/11/05). PTD is being studied in Slovenia for more than three decades.^72-77
Most of women that deliver preterm, do not have risk factors written in Tables 2 and 3. What is as important, we can not influence these factors (except perhaps smoking habits). So to improve prediction and management various tests – compatible with mechanisms of PTD - are added. Entering the study, women fill in the Prediction model for preterm delivery risk estimation, the well being questionnaire and the questionnaire regarding social quality of life. Smears for detecting BV (we use Nugent and Amsel scoring) and pathogenic bacteria are taken. Cervical length is measured in 22nd to 24th w.p.^78,79
In the case the cervix is shorter than 25 mm, EHG is performed and repeated in 32nd to 34th w.p. After delivery, the data on pregnancy, delivery and neonate are completed.

MANAGEMENT OF THE HIGH RISK GROUP FOR PRETERM DELIVERY

In most of the literature it is stated that preterm delivery can not be prevented.⁸⁰ This is certainly true if we take 37 w.p. as a limit. But, as survival over 32 w.p. is almost 100%, our aim is to achieve 32 or at least 28 w.p. As preterm labor (and delivery) have many causes, it is important to lower or remove as many as possible.

Management early in the process of preterm labor
Pregnant women must have prenatal care. It sounds too simple: but sometimes everything is done that the woman conceives; when she does, prenatal care just seems to be “not scientific enough” and they forget about it.
Progesterone
With use of 250mg 17-α-hydroxy-progesterone caproate per week the incidence of VPTD was 11.4% in treated group and 19.6% in control group of women who previously had PTD.⁸¹ In the group of high risk women that was given vaginal suppositories with 100 mg progesterone per day the incidence of PTD under 34 w.p. was 2.7% vs 18,5% in the control group.⁸²
In the group of women with cervical length less than 15 mm in midgestation 200 mg of vaginal progesterone from 24 to 34 w.p. PTD before 34 w.p. was less frequent (19.2%) than in the placebo group (34.4%).⁸³
Management of women with chronic diseases
These women represent the majority of those who have iatrogenic PTD. The percentage of iatrogenic PTD is rising all over the developed world, especially VPTD. Because of increasing age at parturition, there are more pregnant women with diabetes mellitus and patients with hypertensive diseases of pregnancy.⁸⁴
There are patients with systemic lupus erythematodes, transplanted kidneys, heart diseases, respiratory diseases and others. Team approach is used for best results for the mother and the baby.
Management of infections
In Cochrane database there is a statement, that therapy for asymptomatic bacteriuria lowers the possibility of pyelonephritis, but does not lower the incidence of PTD.⁸⁵ Treatment of periodontal disease decreases the incidence of PTD.^86,87 Hauth found that treatment of BV in high risk group decreased the incidence of PTD.⁸⁸ Kekki included 5432 pregnant women into prospective, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled research.³³ There was no difference in the incidence of PTD between women, treated for BV, and those who were given placebo, but women, where BV relapsed, delivered preterm 7 times more often. Hoyme and Saling introduced a programme of self determination of vaginal pH.³⁴ If it was over 4.7, women were instructed to visit gynaecologist. When BV was present, they were treated locally, when not they were only given Lactobacillus acidophilus medication. The percentage of VPTD among more than 16000 pregnant women was 0.99% in research and 1.58% in the control group. Nishijima gave Lactobacillus Johnsonii per os with similar results.^35,36 Ugwumadu also gave oral treatment to BV positive women in their prospective placebo controlled study of 485 pregnant women; the incidence of PTD was decreased.⁸⁹ Kiss found that treatment of asymptomatic vaginal infection in the research group of 4429 women decreased PTD.³⁷ After they were criticised because of expenses, they also provided financial analysis.³⁸ As a basis they took financial burden of preterm neonate with 1.900 g birth weight and care for the child until its sixth year; it was estimated to be 60,262 Eur. This was compared to expenses of the screening program including expenses for medicines.
With 50 % of reduction of PTD 11 000 000 Eur per year would be saved in Vienna only; expenses for the screening program together with drugs represented only 7% of this money.
On the other side, there are reports, that giving bactericidal metronidazol increases risk for PTD.⁴⁰
There are reports that vaginal douching 6 months before pregnancy decreases the risk for PTD for 63%; douching in pregnancy, however, increases the risk for 64%.⁹⁰
Liu showed in mice that TL4 receptor antagonist, induced by Fusobacterium nucleatum, in 50 % prevents the death of the fetus because of inflammation.⁹¹
The summary can be that as early as possible in pregnancy – at least in the beginning of the second trimester – pathogenic organisms should be removed from vagina before the inflammatory process is triggered. Treatment later or treatment with metronidazol may harm because toxic products may trigger new cascades. It is for this reason that the results of studies are controversial.
Cerclage
There is no clear cut answer.⁹² In a well known study in 47123 pregnant women cervix length was measured. If it was less then 15 mm, women were randomized into the group with cerclage (253) or no cerclage. There were 22% of VPTD in the research and 26% in the control group. There was no statistical significance (RR 0,84; 95% CI 0,54-1,31), which does not mean there was no clinical significance. The main author later demonstrated, that besides cervix length the obstetrical history is also important.⁸
In women with high risk for PTD (previous preterm delivery, cervical trauma, diethylstilboestrol exposure, uterine anomalies) and cervix length under 25mm before 27 w.p., the incidence of PTD before 34 w.p. decreased after cerclage.⁹³ Cerclage may also be the cause of complications.⁹⁴
Omega-3 fatty acids
In women with PTD in their history, the incidence of PTD under 34 w.p. decreased for 68% with use of omega-3 fat acids.⁹⁵
Psychological support, social support, proper nutrition
Tender loving care (TLC) is efficient in management of recurrent misscariage.⁹⁶ Mamelle showed that psychological support decreases the incidence of PTD in women with high risk for PTD.^97,98 BMI below 20kg/m2, standing at work for more than 2 hours per day, and stress were shown to be socio-economic and psycho-social risk factors for PTD. It is advisable to increase BMI over 20kg/m2 or decrease below 35kg/m2, change working conditions and give support in acute emotional problems.⁹⁹ PTD is more common in the lowest social class, so it was expected that social and psychological support would decrease the incidence, which was proven.^22,100 Regarding the difference in the incidence of PTD in Europe and U.S.A. Meis states, that in latter there is no real social support.³
Decades ago more information was given to pregnant women regarding proper nutrition; at that time people were poor and could not afford quality food. Today many women are on strange diets, some even take drugs for loosing weight. Inappropriate nutrition can have dire consequences in next generations.²³
Corticosteroids when fibronectin is positive
Specificity of fetal fibronectin as marker of all pathogenetic processes of preterm delivery is high; positive predictive values is more than 50 %.⁶¹ Some authors suggest that all pregnant women, pregnant over 23 w.p. and with positive fibronectin, should be given corticosteroids for fetal lung maturation.¹³ Progesterone efficiency was also proven in high risk patients.
In our research, if women score below a certain cut-off point, they are offered psychological and social support. There are algorithms for management if pathogenic bacteria, BV or short cervix are discovered.

Management late in the process of preterm labor
Corticosteroids
Repeated doses influence fetal growth and behavioural changes. At 30 years of age of those, who were given steroids when in utero, also had changed response to glucose tolerance test.¹⁰¹
Tocolysis
Tocolysis does not prevent PTD but prolong pregnancy for a few days.¹⁰² Many drugs are used, but only β-mimetics and atosiban are registered for tocolysis.^103,104 All other drugs are used ‘‘off-label’’. Drugs that are used have unwanted side effects.^105,106 There are data in the Cochrane database that magnesium sulphate is not efficient as tocolytic and that perinatal mortality is higher with its use; nevertheless it is still being used.^107-109 On the basis of retrospective study decreased incidence of cerebral palsy was hypothesised.¹¹⁰ Mittendorf and Pryde calculated that because of magnesium sulphate use 1900 additional neonates die in U.S.A.; and may be 400 less have cerebral palsy.¹⁰⁹
In the future it might be proven that adding low doses of magnesium sulphate to tocolytics decreases the incidence of cerebral palsy.^104,109,111 Atosiban has, compared to β-mimetics, less side effects.¹¹² Exogenous donors of NO do calm myometrium but at the same time provoke cervical ripening.¹¹³
Prevention and early diagnosis of fetal anomalies
Primary prevention and early diagnosis of lethal malformations or chromsomopathies can decrease the PTD rate.¹¹⁴

DISCUSSION

There is absolute agreement that preterm birth is a major public health issue. It may well be proven in the future, that in fact there are two diseases: preterm labor and delivery before 32 (according to some authors 34) w.p. and preterm labor and delivery from 32 (34) to 37 w.p. It is the VPTD, i.e. before 32 w.p., that is most important to prevent.
VPTD may be divided into spontaneous and iatrogenic. The unwanted result, i.e. a preterm neonate with immediate need for intensive therapy and long term handicap, is the same, however the management is different. This is the reason we discuss VPTD as an entity, even if authors do not agree.¹¹⁵ In the future, when genetic and other causes are found, the definitions will be different.
The multitude of different prediction schemes shows that none is perfect. Some risk factors are not valid for all populations; that was partly explained by genetic differences. There is no agreement in the literature what primary and what secondary predictors are.^115,116 Some authors define primary predictors as those from medical history: conisation, previous preterm delivery, pathological signs from the current pregnancy (bleeding, e.g.) and pathological results of additional tests (BV, positive fibronectin, short cervix).¹¹⁶ Others define as primary predictors only those from medical history, all the others as secondary.¹¹⁵ The fact is we can not change the factors from medical history (conisation, diabetes mellitus, previous preterm delivery etc). The same is true for pathological events in pregnancy (bleeding, e.g.).
These are the basic predictors for individual women with high risk for preterm delivery; these women represent minority of those who do deliver preterm. In Slovenia, according to the Prediction model for preterm delivery risk estimation, each of these factors was given a score.
In the future genes, defining high risk for preterm delivery, will be determined.¹¹⁷ Preterm delivery is also an inherited disease.¹¹⁸ Genes can not be changed; expression of genes may be influenced by environment. Epigenetic influences are very important.²³ For the time being, the prediction on the basis of cervical length and obstetric history is the most promising.⁸
It was only in France that temporary decrease in PTD rate was achieved in seventies and eighties of the previous century.² Early prenatal care was offered to all pregnant women, information was spread regarding life style in pregnancy, risk factors, and early signs of preterm labor, sick leave and maternity leave were offered. In 1972, there were 2.4% of PTD under 34 w.p. and only 0.9% in 1988. In that year there were 4.9% PTD altogether, but ten years later, in 1998, there were already 6.27%, the increase being mostly because of iatrogenic PTD and PTD in immigrants.
In U.S.A. the effort to decrease PTD did not succeed; Meis commented that it was so because there was no media support and no governmental policy regarding maternity leave existed.³
We can put risk factors/signs in two broad categories: those we can not and those that we could influence; in the latter group, we could intervene before pregnancy, early in the process of PTD or late in the process of PTD.
Some risk factors we can not influence (examples in the brackets):
- Facts from medical history (e.g. previous preterm delivery);
- Positive results of tests (e.g. short cervix).
Some risk factors we could partially influence (possible intervention in the brackets):
a. Before pregnancy:
- Ignorance (education);
- Congenital uterine anomalies (correct);
- Unplanned pregnancies (plan);
- BMI under 20kg/m2 or over 35kg/m2 (change);
- Smoking (stop);
b. Early in the process of labor:
- Women with high risk (progesterone);
- BV or pathogenic bacteria (treat properly);
- Psychological stress (support);
- Socio-economic problems (social support);
- Short cervix (progesterone, cerclage);
- Maternal disease (treat accordingly, prevent complications);
c. Late in the process of labor when delivery is imminent:
- Pulmonary immaturity (corticosteroids);
- Infection/ inflammation (antibiotics);
- Contractions (tocolysis, in utero transport to a center with NICU).
In the future, some more risk factors will move into the group where prevention is possible. At the moment an example is operative correction of uterine anomalies.¹¹⁹
The area of primary prevention is very interesting from the psychological view also. Since 1991 it is well known that folic acid prevents more than 70% of neural tube defects when taken properly from conception until the 8 w.p. Women with metabolic syndrome and epilepsy, who have elevated risk for NTD, should take ten times larger dose, i.e. 4000 μg of folic acid per day.
All women without contraception should take folic acid; even those, who think they do not want a baby. It is well known they change their minds when they become pregnant. It is an extremely depressing truth that all over the world only a minority of women takes folic acid properly.
Not taking folic acid some call the biggest defeat of public health endeavours. As if taking folic acid is an advice too simple and too cheap to follow!120 It is to be hoped that regarding PTD the attitude will be different..
As interesting is comparison of screening for trisomy 21 (T21) and screening for PTD. Screening for T21 was first done on the basis of maternal age, triple test, nuchal translucency, double test, quadruple test, integrated test etc. Pregnant women definitely know about that screening much more than about screening for preterm delivery. The incidence of T21 depends on the population’s average age; in a very “old” population it is around 2/1000. The incidence of EPTD is 5/1000 in Slovenia, and of VPTD 11/1000. It is true that all preterm neonates do not have long term handicap. It is to be seen if different combinations of the same test would predict different complications.^{121, 122} At the end, with genomics, proteomics and pharmacogenomics, the prediction and management will be specific.¹²³

CONCLUSIONS

Prolongation of pregnancy is possible
In women with high risk for PTD, also after ART, and short cervix, progesterone should be given from midgestation to 34 w.p.
Cerclage may be indicated in high risk women with short cervix.
As soon as possible – at least at the beginning of second trimester – abnormal vaginal flora is to be discovered and treated. Later treatment or treatment with metronidazol can harm
Free prenatal care, paid sick leave, psychological and social support, proper nutrition and other state based interventions are very important.
When preterm delivery is imminent, tocolysis, administration of corticosteroids (once), and in utero transport to a centre with NICU decrease neonatal morbidity and mortality.
Before planned pregnancy some interventions (correction of uterine anomalies, achievement of proper BMI etc) can lead to better results regarding VPTD.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

To all researchers in the study RP P3-0124. Special acknowledgement to Ms Martina Peclin. Research programme P3-0124 is financed by Research Agency of Slovenia and Ministry of Health of Slovenia.

REFERENCES

1. Steer P. The epidemiology of preterm labour. BJOG 2005;112:1-3.
2. Papiernik E, Gofffinet F. Prevention of preterm births, the French experience. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2004;47(4):755-67.
3. Meis P. Prevention of preterm birth. In: Queenan J, Spong C, Lockwood C, eds. Management of high risk pregnancy. 5 ed. Malden: Blackwell; 2007:326-32.
4. Babnik J, Stucin-Gantar I, Kornhauser-Cerar L, et al. Intrauterine inflammation and the onset of peri-intraventricular hemorrhage in premature infants Biol Neonate 2006;90(2):113-21.
5. Costeloe K, Hennessy E, Gibson A, et al . The EPICure study: outcomes to discharge from hospital for infants born at the treshold of viability. Pediatrics 2000;106(4):659-71.
6. Slattery M, Morrison J. Preterm delivery. Lancet 2002;360:1489-97.
7. Petrou S. The economic consequences of preterm birth during the first 10 years of life. BJOG 2005;112(Suppl 1):10-5.
8. Celik E, To M, Gajewska K, et al . Cervical length and obstetric history predict spontaneous preterm birth: development and validation of a model to provide individualized risk assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31:549-54.
9. Novak-Antolic Z. Predicting preterm delivery and lowering very preterm delivery rate. J Perinat Med 2001;29:469-75.
10. Verdenik I. Vecplastni napovedni model prezgodnjega poroda. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani; 2002.
11. Verdenik I, Novak-Antolic Z. Multivariate model for prediction of the risk of preterm delivery and proposal for lowering the very preterm delivery rate. In: Carrera J, Cabero L, Baraibar R, editors. 5th world congress of perinatal medicine; 2001; Barcelona: Bologna: Monduzzi editore; 2001. p. 647-50.
12. Verdenik I, Bernik J. Preizkus modela za napovedovanje tveganja prezgodnjega poroda. In: Novak-Antolic Z, editor. Klinicno upravljanje strokovnosti v perinatologiji 10 Novakovi dnevi z mednarodno udelezbo; 2002; Bled: Zdruzenje za perinatalno medicino, SZD; 2002. p. 136-40.
13. Lockwood C. Pathogenesis and prediction of preterm delivery. In: Queenan J, Spong C, Lockwood C, eds. Management of high-risk pregnancy. 5th ed. Malden: Blackwell; 2007.
14. Lockwood C. Biochemical markers of preterm delivery. In: Petraglia F, Strauss J, Gabbe S, Weiss G, eds. Preterm birth. Abingdon: Informa UK; 2007:115-30.
15. Heaps B, House M, Socrate S, et al. Matrix biology and preterm birth. In: Petraglia F, Strauss J, Gabbe S, Weiss G, eds. Preterm Birth. Abingdon: Informa; 2007:70-93.
16. Challis J. Undernutrition, preterm birth, and the prostaglandin pathway. In: Petraglia F, Strauss J, Gabbe S, Weiss G, eds. Preterm Birth. Abingdon: Informa; 2007:51-5.
17. Borders A. Chronic stress linked to preterm deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:331-8.
18. Novak-Antolic Z, Verdenik I. Women with very preterm delivery: is there injustice in obtaining basic health care? In: Carrera J, Cabero L, Baraibar R, editors. Proceedings of the 5th world congress of perinatal medicine; 2001; Barcelona: Monduzzi editore; 2001. p. 716-9.
19. Klemenc A. Vpliv stresa na prezgodnji porod. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani; 2006.
20. Anderson A, Laurence K, Davies K, et al . Fetal adrenal weight and the cause of premature delivery in human pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1971;78:481-8.
21. Turan O, Turan S, Funai E, et al . A novel method to identify women at risk for impending preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:855-62.
22. Patel R, Steer P, Doyle P, et al . Does gestation vary by ethnic group? A London-base study of over 122,000 pregnancies with spontaneous onset of labour. Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:107-13.
23. Gluckman P, Hanson M. The fetal matrix: evolution, development and disease. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
24. Smith GC, Shah I, Pell JP, et al . Maternal obesity in early pregnancy and risk of spontaneous and elective preterm deliveries: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Publ Health 2007;97(1):157-62.
25. Berkowitz G, Lapinski R, Lockwood C, et al . Corticotropin-releasing factor and its binding protein: maternal serum levels in term and preterm deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1477-83.
26. McGregor J, Jackson G, Lachelin G, et al. Salivary estriol as risk assessment for preterm labor: a prospective trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:1337-42.
27. Kniss D, Iams Y. Molecular effectors of human preterm parturition. In: Seifer D, Samuels P, Kniss A, eds. The physiologic basis of gynecology and obstetrics. Philadelphia: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins; 2001:442-55.
28. Hobel C, Dunkel-Schetter C, Roesch S, et al . Maternal plasma corticotropin-releasing hormone associated with stress at 20 weeks’ gestation in pregnancies ending in preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;180:S257-63.
29. Verdenik I, Pajntar M. Socialni in delovni vplivi na prezgodnji porod v Sloveniji. In: ZGP, editor. II kongres ginekologov in porodnicarjev Slovenije z mednarodno udelezbo 19 do 22 novembra 2000; Portoroz; 2000. p. 224-5.
30. Meis P. Prevention of preterm birth. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2004;47(4):753-5.
31. Vergnes J-N, Sixou M. Preterm low birth weight and maternal periodontal status: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:131-5.
32. Novak M, Prosen B. Pogostnost bakterijske vaginoze in povezava s prezgodnjim porodom. Med Razgl 1998;37:483-96.
33. Kekki M, Kurki T, Pelkonen J, et al. Vaginal clindamycin in preventing preterm births and peripartal infections in asymptomatic women with bacterial vaginosis: a randomized, controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97 (5 Pt 1) : 643-8.
34. Hoyme U, Saling E. Efficient prematurity prevention is possible by pH-self measurement and immediate therapy of threatening ascending infection. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004;115(2):148-53.
35. Nishijima K, Shukunami K, Kotsuji F. Probiotics affects vaginal flora in pregnant women, suggesting the possibility of preventing preterm labor. J Clin Gastroenterol 2005;39(5):447-8.
36. Nishijima K, Shukunami K, Kotsuji F, et al . Comment on “efficient prematurity prevention is possible by pH self-measurement and immediate therapy of threatening ascending infection”. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006;125(1):146.
37. Kiss H, Petricevic L, Husslein P. Prospective randomised controlled trial of an infection screening programme to reduce the rate of preterm delivery. BMJ 2004;329(7462):371-5.
38. Kiss H, Pichler E, Petricevic L, et al . Cost effectiveness of a screen-and-treat program for asymptomatic vaginal infections in pregnancy: towards a significant reduction in the costs of prematurity. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006;127(2):198-203.
39. Guerra B, Ghi T, Quarta S, et al. Pregnancy outcome after early detection of bacterial vaginosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006;128(1-2):40-5.
40. Morency A, Bujold E. The effect of second-trimester antibiotic therapy on the rate of preterm birth. J Obstet Gynaecol Canad 2007;29:34-44.
41. Cauci S, Culhane J. Modulation of vaginal immune response among pregnant women with bacterial vaginosis by Trichomonas vaginalis, Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and yeast. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196(2):133.e1-7.
42. Novak-Antolic Z. Bakterijska vaginoza in prezgodnji porod. Zdrav Vestn 1997;66(1):35.
43. Gravett M, Novy M, Rosenfeld R, et al. Diagnosis of intraamniotic infection by proteomic profiling and identification of novel biomarkers. JAMA 2004;292:462-9.
44. Varner M, Esplin M. Current understanding of genetic factors in preterm birth. BJOG 2005;112:28-31.
45. Esplin M, Varner M. Genetic factors in preterm birth - the future. BJOG 2005;112(Suppl 1):97-102.
46. Bukowski R, Hankins G, Saade G, et al . Labor-associated gene expression in the human uterine fundus, lower segment, and cervix. PLoS Med 2006;3(6):918-31.
47. Goldenberg RL, Andrews WW, Faye-Petersen OM, et al . The Alabama preterm birth study: intrauterine infection and placental histologic findings in preterm births of males and females less than 32 weeks. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:1533-7.
48. Gravett M, Hitti J, Hess D, et al. Intrauterine infection and preterm delivery: evidence for activation of the fetal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:1404-13.
49. Bindas A. Primerjava konizacije in LLETZ in prezgodnji porod [Naloga za specialisticni izpit]. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani; 2006.
50. Moreau C, Kaminski M, Ancel P,et al. Previous induced abortions and the risk of very preterm delivery: results of the EPIPAGE study. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2005;60(10):627-8.
51. Assi F, Fruscio R, Bonardi C, et al. Pentraxin 3 in plasma and vaginal fluid in women with preterm delivery. BJOG 2007;114:143-7.
52. Naeye R. Maternal age, obstetric complications, and the outcome of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1983;61:210-6.
53. Zhang J, et al. Large BP rises forewarn of preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197 162.e1-e6.
54. Di Simone N, Maggiano N, Caliandro D, et al. Homocysteine induces trophoblast cell death with apoptotic features. Biol Reprod 2003;69:1129-34.
55. Ayar A, Celik H, Ozcelik O, et al. Homocysteine-induced enhancement of spontaneous contractions of myometrium isolated from pregnant women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003;82:789-93.
56. Engel SM, Olshan AF, Siega-Riz AM, et al . Polymorphisms in folate metabolizing genes and risk for spontaneous preterm and small-for-gestational age birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:1231.e1-.e11.
57. Chaiworapongsa T, Espinoza J, Yoshimatsu J, et al. Activation of coagulation system in preterm labor and preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2002;11:368-73.
58. Henriksen T, Baird D, Olsen J, et al . Time to pregnancy and preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:594-9.
59. Schieve L, Meikle S, Ferre C, et al . Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med 2002;346:731-7.
60. Lockwood C, Senyei A, Dische M, et al. Fetal fibronectin in cervical and vaginal secretions as a predictor of preterm delivery. N Engl J Med 1991;325:669-74.
61. Yeast J, Lu G. Biochemical markers for the prediction of preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 2005;32:369-81.
62. Schmitz T, Maillard F, Bessard-Bacquaert S, et al. Selective use of fetal fibronectin after cervical length measurement to predict spontaneous preterm delivery in women with preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:138-43.
63. Smith V, Devane D, Begley C, et al . A systematic review and quality assessment of systematic reviews of fetal fibronectin and transvaginal length for predicting preterm birth. Eur J Ob Gyn Repr Biol 2007;133:134-42.
64. To M, Alfirevic Z, Heath V, et al. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery in women with short cervix: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;363(9424):1849-53.
65. Berghella V, Roman A, Daskalakis C, et al . Gestational age at cervical length measurement and incidence of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:311-7.
66. Bittar R, da Fonseca E, Carvalho M, et al . Predicting preterm delivery in asymptomatic patients with prior preterm delivery by measurement of cervical length and phosphorylated insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;29(5):562-7.
67. Garfield R, Maner W. Biophysical methods of prediction and prevention of preterm labor: uterine electromyography and cervical light-induced fluorescence - new obstetrical diagnostic techniques. In: Petraglia F, Strauss J, Gabbe S, Weiss G, eds. Preterm Birth. Abingdon: Informa; 2007:131-44.
68. Kavsek G, Pajntar M, Leskosek B. Electromyographic activity of the uterus above the placental implantation site. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1999;48(2):81-4.Kavšek G. Elektromiografija maternice pri grozecem prezgodnjem porodu. [Master thesis]. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani; 2001.
69. Garfield R, Maner W, Maul H, et al. Use of uterine EMG and cervical LIF in monitoring pregnant patients. BJOG 2005;112(Suppl 1):103-8.
70. Loockwood C. Biochemical markers of preterm delivery. In: Petraglia F, Strauss J, Gabbe S, Weiss G, eds. Preterm birth. Abingdon: Informa UK; 2007:115-30.
71. Zupan J. Iskanje faktorjev v populaciji zensk, ki najpogosteje pripeljejo do prezgodnjega poroda ter komplikacij pri novorojencu in matematicna analiza posameznega faktorja. Ljubljana: Ljubljana: Ginekološka klinika; 1981.
72. Pajntar M, Kozuh-Novak M, Novak-Antolic Z, et al. Prezgodnji porod, prezgodaj rojeni otrok in njegov nadaljni razvoj. PORS; URP Reprodukcija cloveka C3-0561/310-86,87,88,89,90,91,92 1986.
73. Novak-Antolic Z, Cerar V, Blejec T, et al. Fiziologija in patofiziologija nosece maternice. Naloga za Raziskovalno skupnost Slovenije, št 09-3698 Projekt: Prezgodnji porod, prezgodaj rojeni otrok in njegov nadaljni razvoj 1987:1-57.
74. Novak-Antolic Z, Verdenik I, Assejev V, et al . Ocenjevanje tveganja za prezgodnji porod. Zdrav Vestn 2001;70(6):347-9.
75. Avanzo-Velkavrh M, Assejev V, Novak-Antolic Z. Vnetja v obporodnem obdobju : 1. pogostnost prisotnosti Chlamydiae trachomatis in streptokoka skupine B pri porodnicah in njihovih novorojenckih. Zdrav Vestn 1998;67(9):515-8.
76. Assejev V, Avanzo-Velkavrh M, Novak-Antolic Z, et al . Vnetja v obporodnem obdobju: 2. ginekološki in porodniški anamnesticni podatki in prezgodnji porod. Zdrav Vestn 2003;72(3):131-4.
77. Nugent R, Krohn M, Hillier S. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by standardised method of Gram stain interpretation. J Cin Microbiol 1991;29:297-301.
78. Amsel R, Totten P, Spiegel C, et al . Nonspecific vaginitis: diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med 1983;74:14-22.
79. Goldenberg R, Rouse D. Prevention of premature birth. N Engl J Med 1998;339(5):313-20.
80. Meis P, Klebanoff M, Thom E, et al. Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2379-85.
81. da Fonseca E, Bittar R, Carvalho M, et al . Prophylactic administration of progesterone by vaginal suppository to reduce the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth in women at increased risk: a randomized placebo-controlled double blind study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:419-24.
82. Fonseca R, Celik E, Parra M, et al . Progesteron and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix. N Engl J Med 2007;357:462-9.
83. Sketelj A, Guzej Z, Tomazic M, et al . Effectiveness of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus and effectiveness of centralized supervision of pregnant women with type 1 diabetes mellitus in Slovenia. In: Novak Antolic Z, editor. Ucinkovitost predporodnega varstva v Sloveniji; 2000; Moravske toplice: ZPM SZD; 2000. p.48-56.
84. Smaill F, Vazquez J. Antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007(2):CD000490. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000490.pub2.
85. López N, Da Silva I, Ipinza J, et al . Periodontal therapy reduces the rate of preterm low birth weight in women with pregnancy-associated gingivitis. J Periodontol 2005;76(11 Suppl):2144-53.
86. Jeffcoat MK, Hauth JC, Geurs NC, et al. Periodontal disease and preterm birth: results of a pilot intervention study. J Periodontol 2003;74(8):1214-8.
87. Hauth J, Goldenberg R, Andrews W, et al . Reduced incidence of preterm delivery with metronidazole and erythromycin in women with bacterial vaginosis. N Engl J Med 1995;333(26):1732-6.
88. Ugwumadu A, Manyonda I, Reid F, et al . Effect of early oral clindamycin on late miscarriage and preterm delivery in asymptomatic women with abnormal vaginal flora and bacterial vaginosis: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003;361:983-8.
89. Misra D. Vaginal douching cuts preterm birth risk. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:140-1.
90. Liu H, Redline R, Han Y. Fusobacterium nucleatum induces fetal death in mice via stimulation of TLR4-mediated placental inflammatory response. J Immunol 2007;197:2501-8.
91. Alfirevic Z. Cerclage: we all know how to do it but can‘t agree when to do it. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:221-6.
92. Althusius S, Dekker G, Hummel P, et al. Final results of the cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial (CIPRACT): therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:1106-12.
93. Drakeley A, Roberts D, Alfirevic Z. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102(3):621-7.
94. Olsen S, Secher N, Tabor A, et al. Randomized clinical trials of fish oil supplementation in high risk pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000;107:382-95.
95. Jauniaux E, Farquharson R, Christiansen E, et al . Evidence-based guidelines for the investigation and treatment of recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod 2006;21(9):2216-22.
96. Mamelle N, Segueilla M, Munoz F, et al . Prevention de la prematurite par une prise en charge psychotherapeutique. Contracept Fertil Sex 1998;26(11):775-80.
97. Mamelle N, Segueilla M, Munoz F, et al . Prevention of preterm birth in patients with symptoms of preterm labor-the benefits of psychologic support. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177(4):947-52.
98. Moutquin J. Socio-economic and psychosocial factors in the management and prevention of preterm labour. BJOG 2003;110(Suppl 20):56-60.
99. Ickovics J, Kershaw T, Westdahl C, et al. Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:330-9.
100. Newnham J, Moss T. Antenatal corticosteroid treatment. In: Petraglia F, Strauss J, Gabbe S, Weiss G, eds. Preterm Birth. Abingdon: Informa; 2007:181-91.
101. Creasy R. Preventing preterm birth. N Engl J Med 1991;325:727-8.
102. Franić D, Novak-Antolic Z, Jurjec D, et al . Magnesium sulfate as tocolytic agent Zdrav Vestn 1995;64:3-7.
103. Bregant L, Novak-Antolic Z, Verdenik I. Tokoliza z betamimetiki in mozganske krvavitve pri nedonošenckih. Zdrav Vestn 1996;65:13-6.
104. Caritis S. Adverse effects of tocolytic therapy. BJOG 2005;112(Suppl 1):74-8.
105. Norwitz E, Robinskon J, Challis J. The control of labor. N Engl J Med 1999;341(9):660-66.
106. Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Doyle LW. Magnesium sulphate for preventing preterm birth in threatened preterm labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002(4):CD001060.
107. Mittendorf R, Covert R, Boman J, et al . Is tocolytic magnesium sulphate associated with increased total pediatric mortality? Lancet 1997;350:1517-8.
108. Mittendorf R, Pryde P. A review of the role for magnesium sulphate in preterm labour. BJOG 2005;112(Suppl 1):84-8.
109. Nelson K, Grether J. Can magnesium sulfate reduce the risk of cerebral palsy in very low birth-weight infants? Pediatrics 1995;95:263-9.
110. Doyle L, Crowther C, Middleton P, et al . Magnesium sulphate for women at risk of preterm birth for neuroprotection of the fetus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007(3):CD004661.
111. Husslein P, Cabero Roura L, Dudenhausen J, et al. Atosiban versus usual care for the management of preterm labor. J Perinat Med 2007;35:305-13.
112. Norman J, Osman I. Nitric oxide. In: Petraglia F, Strauss J, Gabbe S, Weiss G, eds. Preterm Birth. Abingdon: Informa; 2007:94-102.
113. Dolan S, Gross S, Merkatz I, et al . The contribution of birth defects to preterm birth and low birth weight. . Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:318-24.
114. Leitich H. Secondary predictors of preterm labour. BJOG 2005;112:48-50.
115. Goffinet F. Primary predictors of preterm labour. BJOG 2005;112:38-47.
116. Ward K. Genetics of preterm delivery. In: Petraglia F, Strauss J, Gabbe S, Weiss G, eds. Preterm Birth. Abingdon: Informa; 2007:145-55.
117. Ward K, Argyle V, Meade M, et al . The heritability of preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:1235-9.
118. Ribic-Pucelj M. Razvojne nepravilnosti maternice kot vzrok za prezgodnji porod in intrauterini zastoj rasti ploda. [PhD]. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani; 1996.
119. Završnik S, Novak-Antolic Z. Dodajanje folne kisline preprecuje napake v zapiranju nevralne cevi. Stanje v Sloveniji. In: Prezgodnji porod in nedonošencek 2 Novakovi dnevi z mednarodno udelezbo; 2001 2001 maj 31-jun 2; Maribor: Ljubljana: Slovensko zdravniško društvo, Zdruzenje za perinatalno medicino; 2001. p. 177-84.
120. Tul N, Novak-Antolic Z. Serum PAPP-A levels at 10-14 weeks of gestation are altered in women after assisted conception. Prenat Diagn 2006;26(13):1206-11.
121. Tul N, Pušenjak S, Osredkar J, et al . Predicting complications of pregnancy with first-trimester maternal serum free-betahCG, PAPP-A and inhibin-A. Prenat Diagn 2003;23(12):990-6.
122. Cho C-K, Shan S, Winsor E, et al . Proteomic analysis and of human amniotic fluid. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2007;6:1406-15.